On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 03:08:58PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 08:56:23PM +0100, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > > > >I think we need to focus on things that _can't_ be done first, rather > > >than things that require porting, e.g. until we had savepoints, you > > >couldn't migrate an application that needed it. It wasn't a question of > > >porting --- there was just no way to port it. > > > > > >Those _missing_ pieces should be a priority. > > > > Nested/autonomous transactions? Do they occur often in PL/SQL code? > > Yes, they do based on the number of "I can't port from Oracle" > complaints we used to get, perhaps related to exceptions. Once we had > them, the complaints of that type disappeared.
Oh, I was talking about savepoints/nested-transactions, not autonomous transactions. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
