Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> Bah. I was sure I was missing something, still I would have thought
> that the index scan is cheaper than the bitmap index scan with ORDER
> BY. As far as I can see, this patch is not the most elegant thing, but
> it has value. So marked as "ready for committer".
Pushed, thanks for the review.
regards, tom lane
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: