On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 02:55:39PM +1100, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Fujitsu was interested in developing a columnar storage extension with
> minimal
> > changes the server backend.
> >
> > The columnar store is implemented as an extension using index access
> methods.
> > This can be easily enhanced with pluggable storage methods once they are
> > available.
> Have you see this post from 2015:
>         https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150831225328.GM2912%
> 40alvherre.pgsql

Thanks for the information.
Yes, I already checked that mail thread. The proposal in that thread was
trying to add
the columnar storage in the core itself. The patch that is proposed is an
extension to
provide columnar storage with the help of index.

May be we can discuss the pros and cons in adding columnar store in the
core itself
or a pluggable storage approach.

Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia

Reply via email to