On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Looking at this patch, I am not sure that it is worth worrying about.
> This is a receipt to make back-patching a bit more complicated, and it
> makes the code more complicated to understand. So I would vote for
> rejecting it and move on.

I have done so for now to make the CF move, if somebody wants to
complain feel free...

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to