Tom, * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > > * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > >> Here's an updated version of the RLS planning patch that gets rid of > >> the incorrect interaction with Query.hasRowSecurity and adjusts > >> terminology as agreed. > > > I've spent a fair bit of time going over this change to understand it, > > how it works, and how it changes the way RLS and securiy barrier views > > work. > > Thanks for the review. Attached is an updated patch that I believe > addresses all of the review comments so far. The code is unchanged from > v2, but I improved the README, some comments, and the regression tests.
I've reviewed your updates and they answer all of my comments and I appreciate the EC regression tests you added. I also agree with Dean's down-thread suggested regression test change. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature