On 2017-01-18 17:34:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > (I also noticed the previous patch should have had a catversion bump :(, > > will do after the meeting). > > Uh, why? It isn't touching any on-disk data structure.
Forget what I said - I was rushing to a meeting and not thinking entirely clearly. Was thinking about the new node types and that we now (de)serialize plans for parallelism - but that's guaranteed to be the same version. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers