On 2017-01-18 17:34:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes:
> > (I also noticed the previous patch should have had a catversion bump :(,
> > will do after the meeting).
> Uh, why? It isn't touching any on-disk data structure.
Forget what I said - I was rushing to a meeting and not thinking
entirely clearly. Was thinking about the new node types and that we now
(de)serialize plans for parallelism - but that's guaranteed to be the
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: