Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane writes: >> Maybe I'm just a Luddite, but I've never understood what autoheader >> buys us that's worth the trouble of conforming to its restrictions.
> We wouldn't have to edit the config.h file by hand whenever some editing > of configure.in occurs. That's all, but I'm not aware of any real > restrictions that that would impose. Mph. Well, there is some advantage in separating the manually-settable config options from the automatically set ones (don't have to worry about whether to edit config.h.in or config.h), so your plan is probably a good idea in any case. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster