Hiroshi Inoue,
But still can't explain this:
SENSITIVE => not READ_ONLY
It's in the ODBC Spec.
>Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, no idea. Peter's idea is that FOR UPDATE requires SENSITIVE, so
>> INSENSITIVE has to be READONLY because the update has to see other
>> changes to be accurate.
>>
>> I think clearly SENSITIVE/READONLY should be possible, so:
>>
>> READONLY/SENSITIVE possible
>> READONLY/INSENSITIVE possible
>> FOR UPDATE/SENSITIVE possible
>> FOR UPDATE/INSENSITIVE not possible
>>
>> READONLY can be either way, while FOR UPDATE requires SENSITIVE.
>
>SENSITIVE doesn't mean *not INSENESITIVE*.
>INSENSITIVE doesn't mean *not SENSITIVE*.
>
>regards,
>Hiroshi Inoue
> http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Regards!
Han
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
2003-03-28
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
