Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Sorry, no idea.  Peter's idea is that FOR UPDATE requires SENSITIVE, so
> INSENSITIVE has to be READONLY because the update has to see other
> changes to be accurate.
> I think clearly SENSITIVE/READONLY should be possible, so:
>         READONLY/SENSITIVE      possible
>         READONLY/INSENSITIVE    possible
>         FOR UPDATE/SENSITIVE    possible
>         FOR UPDATE/INSENSITIVE  not possible
> READONLY can be either way, while FOR UPDATE requires SENSITIVE.

SENSITIVE doesn't mean *not INSENESITIVE*.
INSENSITIVE doesn't mean *not SENSITIVE*.

Hiroshi Inoue

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])

Reply via email to