Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Sorry, no idea. Peter's idea is that FOR UPDATE requires SENSITIVE, so
> INSENSITIVE has to be READONLY because the update has to see other
> changes to be accurate.
>
> I think clearly SENSITIVE/READONLY should be possible, so:
>
> READONLY/SENSITIVE possible
> READONLY/INSENSITIVE possible
> FOR UPDATE/SENSITIVE possible
> FOR UPDATE/INSENSITIVE not possible
>
> READONLY can be either way, while FOR UPDATE requires SENSITIVE.
SENSITIVE doesn't mean *not INSENESITIVE*.
INSENSITIVE doesn't mean *not SENSITIVE*.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
(send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibility Neil Conway
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibility Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibility Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibilit... Neil Conway
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visib... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibility snpe
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibility Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibilit... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibility Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibilit... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visib... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & v... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors &a... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursor... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cu... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cu... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cu... Tom Lane
