Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Sorry, no idea. Peter's idea is that FOR UPDATE requires SENSITIVE, so > INSENSITIVE has to be READONLY because the update has to see other > changes to be accurate. > > I think clearly SENSITIVE/READONLY should be possible, so: > > READONLY/SENSITIVE possible > READONLY/INSENSITIVE possible > FOR UPDATE/SENSITIVE possible > FOR UPDATE/INSENSITIVE not possible > > READONLY can be either way, while FOR UPDATE requires SENSITIVE. SENSITIVE doesn't mean *not INSENESITIVE*. INSENSITIVE doesn't mean *not SENSITIVE*. regards, Hiroshi Inoue http://www.geocities.jp/inocchichichi/psqlodbc/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
- [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibility Neil Conway
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibility Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibility Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibilit... Neil Conway
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visib... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibility snpe
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibility Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibilit... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibility Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visibilit... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & visib... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors & v... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursors &a... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cursor... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cu... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cu... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cu... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] updateable cu... Tom Lane