Attached is an alternative implementation of MATERIALIZED VIEWs. The idea is to explore possible enahncements to the PostgreSQL MATERIALIZED VIEW features.
Features: - All SQL-coded. - Keeps history of deltas computed at each refresh. - Allows DMLs of the materialized view, recording the changes in the same way as deltas from refreshes. This allows one to code TRIGGERs which update materialized views directly. Where synchronous updates of an MV can be fast, a TRIGGER can do it by querying the source view with additional constraints derived from the OLD/NEW rows, and then apply DMLs to the materialization table. - MVs can be marked as needing a refresh. This is useful where a synchronous update would be too slow. Use a TRIGGER to mark the MV as needing a refresh and NOTIFY a waiting service. - Refreshes have the same concurrency semantics as REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW CONCURRENTLY. - Allows indices and constraints to be added to the materialzation table. Issues: - NULLs in columns of the VIEW cause spurious deltas to be recorded for every refresh. This is because two rows which are equal when considering NULLs to be equal are... not equal as far as SQL goes, thus such rows always appear to be deleted and inserted. This implementation uses a NATURAL FULL OUTER JOIN to compute the deltas between a before and an after materialization of a view during a refresh. This avoids having to generate a USING(), which is a very convenient simplification, but also part of the source of this problem with NULLs. (The history table has two record-type columns to hold entire rows.) - No integration. - Wonky column names in the history table ("awld", "noo"). Ideas: - CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW should have these additional options, and ALTER MATERIALIZED VIEW should allow these to be specified after creation: - WITH [UNLOGGED] HISTORY TABLE schema_name.table_name - WITH PRIMARY KEY (column_list) -- probably not in ALTER MV though A PK on an MV does make sense when one considers the admonition in the PG docs to not have duplicate rows in the view... Besides, an MV has a materialization table, and tables generally should have PKs! - WITH CONSTRAINT <constraint> (same as in ALTER TABLE ADD constraint) Also, a new type of JOIN might be useful: one that joins using only columns that are part of the PK of both table sources. Obviously this would not be a generally-applicable JOIN type, as it would not work for table sources that are subqueries or plain views... But it would be useful here for generating the FULL OUTER JOIN needed for computing deltas between tables of the same form. Nico --
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers