On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Maybe this is a terminology problem.  I'm taking "false positive" to mean
> "checksum reports a failure, but in fact there is no observable data
> corruption".  Depending on why the false positive occurred, that might
> help alert you to underlying storage problems, but it isn't helping you
> with respect to being able to access your perfectly valid data.

It was a terminology problem. Thank you for the clarification.

Peter Geoghegan

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to