On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 6:01 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Maybe this is a terminology problem. I'm taking "false positive" to mean > "checksum reports a failure, but in fact there is no observable data > corruption". Depending on why the false positive occurred, that might > help alert you to underlying storage problems, but it isn't helping you > with respect to being able to access your perfectly valid data.
It was a terminology problem. Thank you for the clarification. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
