On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:58 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > On 2017-01-24 15:50:47 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> I am marking this patch as "returned with feedback". That's quite a >> heavy change and it looks to be too late in the development cycle of >> PG10 to consider it. Peter's commit bits, who is also the reviewer, >> are beginning to smoke as well after everything that has happened for >> the logical replication changes. > > I'm doubtful about this being ready in time too, but it seems a might > heavyhanded to make that call on your own. Including the judgement about > Peter's capability to handle more.
Sure, sorry for that. I am switching back the patch, let's see what happens by the end of the CF. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers