I'm sorry but I think I don't have time to work on this patch in this CF.
I've gotten busy for another work.

So I moved this patch to next CF with "waiting on author" status.

Ideriha Takeshi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ideriha, Takeshi 
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2017 6:12 PM
> To: 'Michael Paquier' <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Michael Meskes <mes...@postgresql.org>; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: [WIP] RE: [HACKERS] DECLARE STATEMENT setting up a connection in
> > Idehira-san, this is a very intrusive patch... It really needs a
> > specific reviewer to begin with, but really it would be nice if you
> > could review someone else's patch, with a difficulty rather equivalent to
> what we have here.
> Michael, thank you for taking a look at my patch and giving me an advice.
> And sorry that I didn't follow a procedure of developing postgresql.
> I think I should have sent a system design idea or small patch first and made
> it bigger and bigger step by step instead of dumping a huge patch suddenly.
> Yeah, I'm going to reviewing hackers' patches.
> > By the way, I have been able to crash your patch when running the
> > regression
> > tests:
> Thank you for checking and I'm going to handle this.
> Regards,
> Ideriha Takeshi

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to