On 1/19/17 12:47 PM, Andrey Borodin wrote: > 4. There is some controversy on where implemented feature shall be: in > separate extension (as in this patch), in db_link, in some PL API, in FDW or > somewhere else. I think that new extension is an appropriate place for the > feature. But I’m not certain.
I suppose we should decide first whether we want pg_background as a separate extension or rather pursue extending dblink as proposed elsewhere. I don't know if pg_background allows any use case that dblink can't handle (yet). -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
