On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 8:06 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 1/24/17 4:47 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >> I'm not excited about starting to change pg_clog before we finish with >> xlog -> wal. Then we just have two half-done things, IMO. But I'm >> also not the only one with a commit bit. > > I think that depends on which way you slice the overall mission. You > appear to think the mission is to have everything named consistently. I > thought the mission was to have no directories named *log*.
Those are two different missions. Deciding what to do for the renaming of pg_xlog does not prevent pg_clog and pg_subtrans to be renamed as no functions and no binaries use those terms. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers