On 1/30/17 12:42 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Sure. Thanks for looking into that and getting a patch out. Oh, I have
> just noticed that sequence_1.out has been removed by 9c18104c. That's
> nice.
> Looking at the patch adding some new tests, the coverage really
> increases (I did not run make coverage to be honest, but that's
> clearly an improvement).
>
> Another test that could be added is about nextval() and setval() that
> only work for temporary sequences in a read-only transaction:
> create sequence foo;
> create temp sequence footemp;
> begin read only;
> select nextval('footemp'); -- ok
> select nextval('foo'); -- error
> rollback;
> begin read only;
> select setval('footemp', 1); -- ok
> select setval('foo', 1); -- error
> rollback
>
> But it is a bit funky I agree.
Looks useful to me. I have committed the tests with your addition.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
