On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 3:33 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
> <fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> > On 1/26/17 1:20 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
>> > > Ok, but doing in that way the syntax would be:
>> > >
>> > > COMMENT ON DATABASE CURRENT_DATABASE IS 'comment';
>> > Yes, that's right. We also have ALTER USER CURRENT_USER already.
>> Ok, but if we make CURRENT_DATABASE reserved wouldn't it lead us to a
>> conflict with current_database() function?
Patch marked as returned with feedback as no new version has been
provided for the last 2 weeks and a half. Please feel free to update
if that's not adapted. The patch was waiting on author's input for
some time by the way..
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: