On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Vladimir Borodin <r...@simply.name> wrote:
> 31 янв. 2017 г., в 9:50, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com>
> написал(а):
>> I am marking this patch as returned with feedback.
> Michael, sorry, but why?

Because I have been through many patches today.

> If I understood everything right, the main question
> from Jeff was why is it implemented in such way? And Jeff wanted to see
> other ways of solving the problem. Andrew wrote about them above and it
> seems that implementing them would be quite expensive and without any
> obvious win. I would rather expect some reaction from Jeff or may be someone
> else, so shouldn’t it be marked as «Ready for committer» or at least «Moved
> to next CF»?

I have moved to to the next CF.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to