On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 4:31 PM, Vladimir Borodin <r...@simply.name> wrote: > 31 янв. 2017 г., в 9:50, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> > написал(а): > >> I am marking this patch as returned with feedback. > > Michael, sorry, but why?
Because I have been through many patches today. > If I understood everything right, the main question > from Jeff was why is it implemented in such way? And Jeff wanted to see > other ways of solving the problem. Andrew wrote about them above and it > seems that implementing them would be quite expensive and without any > obvious win. I would rather expect some reaction from Jeff or may be someone > else, so shouldn’t it be marked as «Ready for committer» or at least «Moved > to next CF»? I have moved to to the next CF. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
