On 2/1/17 3:36 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 7:01 AM, Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> wrote:
On 2/1/17 10:27 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
This looks fine to me.
This could go without the comments, they are likely going to be
forgotten if any updates happen in the future.

I'm confused... I put the comments in there so if max shared buffers ever changed the other one would hopefully be updated as well.

Speaking of which... I have a meeting in 15 minutes to discuss moving to a server with 4TB of memory. With current limits shared buffers maxes at 16TB, which isn't all that far in the future. While 16TB of shared buffers might not be a good idea, it's not going to be terribly long before we start getting questions about it.
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to