On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Bernd Helmle <maili...@oopsware.de> wrote:
> > UPD: It appears that Postgres Pro have access to big Power machine > > now. > > So, I can do testing/benchmarking myself. > > We currently also have access to a LPAR on an E850 machine with 4 > sockets POWER8 running a Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Server ppc64el OS. I can do > some tests next week, if you need to verify your findings. > Very good, thank you! I tried lwlock-power-2.patch on multicore Power machine we have in PostgresPro. I realized that using labels in assembly isn't safe. Thus, I removed labels and use relative jumps instead (lwlock-power-2.patch). Unfortunately, I didn't manage to make any reasonable benchmarks. This machine runs AIX, and there are a lot of problems which prevents PostgreSQL to show high TPS. Installing Linux there is not an option too, because that machine is used for tries to make Postgres work properly on AIX. So, benchmarking help is very relevant. I would very appreciate that. ------ Alexander Korotkov Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com The Russian Postgres Company
lwlock-power-3.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
