On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 3:33 AM, David Rowley
> On 14 February 2017 at 10:56, Brad DeJong <brad.dej...@infor.com> wrote:
>> David Rowley wrote:
>>> I propose we just remove the whole paragraph, and mention about
>>> the planning and estimated number of groups stuff in another new paragraph.
>>> I've attached a patch to this effect ...
>> s/In a worse case scenario/In the worst case scenario,/
>> Other than that, the phrasing in the new patch reads very smoothly.
> Thanks. Updated patch attached.
+ Aggregate</> stage. For such cases there is clearly going to be no
+ performance benefit to using parallel aggregation.
A comma is required after "For such cases"
> The query planner takes
> + this into account during the planning process and will choose how to
> + perform the aggregation accordingly.
This part of the sentence sounds unclear. It doesn't clearly
indicate that planner won't choose a parallel plan in such cases.
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: