Andres Freund <> writes:
> On 2016-11-26 08:41:28 -0800, Andres Freund wrote:
>> On November 26, 2016 8:06:26 AM PST, Tom Lane <> wrote:
>>> Those don't call functions, they call operators.  Yes, I know that an
>>> operator has a function underlying it, but the user-level expectation
>>> for track_functions is that what it counts are things that look
>>> syntactically like function calls.  I'm not eager to add tracking
>>> overhead for cases that there's been exactly zero field demand for.

>> But we do track for OpExprs? Otherwise I'd agree.

> Bump?

If you're going to insist on foolish consistency, I'd rather take out
tracking in OpExpr than add it in dozens of other places.

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to