Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > I don't quite see the point of this - there's a lot of settings that cause > spurious test failures. I don't see any point fixing random cases of that. > And I don't think the continual cost of doing so overall is worth the minimal > gain.
> What's your reason to get this fixed? FWIW, I'm inclined to do something about Jeff's nearby complaint about operator_precedence_warning, because the cause of that failure is pretty obscure. I'm less excited about this one, because it should be obvious what happened to anyone who looks at the regression diffs. In general I think there's value in "make installcheck" passing when it reasonably can, but you're quite right that there's a lot of setting changes that would break it, and not all are going to be practical to fix. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers