Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> writes: > * Alvaro Herrera (alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: >> Magnus Hagander wrote: >>> I'm guessing if we backpatch something like that, it would cause issues for >>> translations, right? So we should make it head only?
>> We've had the argument a number of times. My stand is that many >> translators are active in the older branches, so this update would be >> caught there too; and even if not, an updated English message is better >> than an outdated native-language message. > That makes sense to me, at least, so +1, for my part. Yeah, if the existing message text is actually wrong or misleading, we should back-patch. I'm not sure I would do that if it's just a cosmetic improvement. In this particular case, +1. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers