On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 3:17 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Nico Williams <n...@cryptonector.com>
> wrote:
> >> I suspect most users, like me, just roll their eyes, grumble, and put up
> >> with it rather than complain.  It's a pain point, but tolerable enough
> >> that no one bothers to demand a change.  Now that it's been done though,
> >> allow me to add my voice in favor of it!
> > +1 to all of that.

My vote doesn't count much but it would be -1.

Question: Will the patch be removed if and when Oracle decides to be
compatible with the standard and forbids non-aliased derived tables?

(I know it's a rather theoretical question. Unlikely that Oracle breaks
backwards compatibility on that.)

Pantelis Theodosiou

Reply via email to