On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 03:01:47PM -0600, Jim Nasby wrote:
> Not sure how many people still use [1], as referenced by our git wiki[2],
> but it appears git worktrees are a viable replacement for that technique. In
> short, if you're already in your checkout:
>
> git worktree add ../9.6 REL9_6_STABLE
>
> would give you a checkout of 9.6 in the ../9.6 directory.
>
> BTW, I learned about this from this "git year in review" article[3].
>
> 1:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20090602162347.gf23...@yugib.highrise.ca
> 2:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Working_with_Git#Continuing_the_.22rsync_the_CVSROOT.22_workflow
> 3:
> https://hackernoon.com/git-in-2016-fad96ae22a15?imm_mid=0ec3e0&cmp=em-prog-na-na-newsltr_20170114#.shgj609ad
Uh, I don't see this in git 2.1.4:
$ git worktree
git: 'worktree' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.
which is in Debian Jessie. This reports worktree was added in 2.5,
released in July 2015:
https://developer.atlassian.com/blog/2015/10/cool-features-git-2.x/
I am glad the git team has seen the value in work trees and it will be
good to use a more officially supported method in the future.
--
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. +
+ Ancient Roman grave inscription +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
