Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> BTW ... can anyone explain to me the reason why we offer to complete
>> CREATE OBJECT with the names of existing objects of that kind?

> Isn't that to facilitate commands appended after CREATE SCHEMA? Say
> table foo is in schema1, and creating it in schema2 gets easier with
> tab completion?

Seems like pretty much of a stretch.  I've never done anything like
that, have you?

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to