Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:12 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> BTW ... can anyone explain to me the reason why we offer to complete >> CREATE OBJECT with the names of existing objects of that kind?
> Isn't that to facilitate commands appended after CREATE SCHEMA? Say > table foo is in schema1, and creating it in schema2 gets easier with > tab completion? Seems like pretty much of a stretch. I've never done anything like that, have you? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers