On 2/16/17 08:13, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote: > @@ -629,7 +630,7 @@ static Node *makeRecursiveViewSelect(char *relname, List > *aliases, Node *query); > > HANDLER HAVING HEADER_P HOLD HOUR_P > > - IDENTITY_P IF_P ILIKE IMMEDIATE IMMUTABLE IMPLICIT_P IMPORT_P IN_P > + IDENTITY_P IF_P ILIKE IMMEDIATE IMMUTABLE IMPLICIT_P IMPORT_P IN_P > INCLUDE > INCLUDING INCREMENT INDEX INDEXES INHERIT INHERITS INITIALLY INLINE_P > INNER_P INOUT INPUT_P INSENSITIVE INSERT INSTEAD INT_P INTEGER > INTERSECT INTERVAL INTO INVOKER IS ISNULL ISOLATION
I think your syntax would read no worse, possibly even better, if you just used the existing INCLUDING keyword. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers