On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> That's without the patch in >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20161123083351.5vramz52nmdokhzz%40alap3.anarazel.de >> ? With that patch it should complete without that change, right? >> > No, it's with the patch in the above link which is > 0001-Resize-simplehash.h-table-in-case-of-long-runs.patch. But, I've > kept the SH_FILLFACTOR to 0.8 and SH_MAX_FILLFACTOR to 0.95. I'll do > another round of testing with the constants provided by you. > I've tested with the patch 0001-Resize-simplehash.h-table-in-case-of-long-runs.patch and the results are same, i.e., hash table grows even when it is only 10-12% filled. I've attached the logfile for reference.
-- Thanks & Regards, Kuntal Ghosh EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers