On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think for now we can keep the parallel safety check for cheapest
> inner path, though it will be of use only for the very first time we
> compare the paths in that loop.  I am not sure if there is any other
> better way to handle the same.

Done that way.

Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: parallel_mergejoin_v8.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to