Hi, On 2017-03-04 11:02:14 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > But speaking of ambiguity: isn't it possible for $n symbols to appear in > pg_stat_statements already?
Indeed. > I think it is, both from extended-protocol > client queries and from SPI commands, which would mean that the proposal > as it stands is not fixing the ambiguity problem at all. So yes, we need > another idea. I think using $ to signal a parameter is still a good idea, as people kinda have to know that one anyway. Maybe one of "$:n" "$-n"? - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
