On 2017-03-04 11:02:14 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> But speaking of ambiguity: isn't it possible for $n symbols to appear in
> pg_stat_statements already?
> I think it is, both from extended-protocol
> client queries and from SPI commands, which would mean that the proposal
> as it stands is not fixing the ambiguity problem at all. So yes, we need
> another idea.
I think using $ to signal a parameter is still a good idea, as people
kinda have to know that one anyway. Maybe one of "$:n" "$-n"?
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: