On 3/4/17 9:08 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:50 PM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Yes, it's taking a time to update logic and measurement but it's >>> coming along. Also I'm working on changing deadlock detection. Will >>> post new patch and measurement result. >> >> I think that we should push this patch out to v11. I think there are >> too many issues here to address in the limited time we have remaining >> this cycle, and I believe that if we try to get them all solved in the >> next few weeks we're likely to end up getting backed into some choices >> by time pressure that we may later regret bitterly. Since I created >> the deadlock issues that this patch is facing, I'm willing to try to >> help solve them, but I think it's going to require considerable and >> delicate surgery, and I don't think doing that under time pressure is >> a good idea. >> >> From a fairness point of view, a patch that's not in reviewable shape >> on March 1st should really be pushed out, and we're several days past >> that. >> > > Agreed. There are surely some rooms to discuss about the design yet, > and it will take long time. it's good to push this out to CF2017-07. > Thank you for the comment.
I have marked this patch "Returned with Feedback." Of course you are welcome to submit this patch to the 2017-07 CF, or whenever you feel it is ready. -- -David da...@pgmasters.net -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers