Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2017-03-07 13:06:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> The hashjoin issue is certainly new, and the reorderbuffer issue can't >> go back further than 9.4. So my inclination is to patch back to 9.4 >> and call it good.
> That works for me. If we find further cases later, we can easily enough > backpatch it then. Done like that. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers