2017-03-09 11:45 GMT+01:00 Victor Wagner <vi...@wagner.pp.ru>: > On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:12:09 +0100 > Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > the regress tests is unstable > > > > the proc name has mutable pid > > > > ! (procedure "__PLTcl_proc_16503" line 3) > > invoked from within > > ! "__PLTcl_proc_16503 SPI" > > > > Regards > > Really, I don't know what can be done with it, short of rewriting all > tests as tap-tests. > > Definitely this patch is not the right place for reversing desing > decision of PL/Tcl authors to add a numeric suffix to the proc names. > (it is not PID. It is OID of the function). > > Of course, I can catch all the errors inside Tcl code and return > just message, but it would sufficiently narrow test functionality. > > Now test demonstrate how errors uncaught on the Tcl level interact with > postgresql error system. >
you can catch the exception outside and write own message Pavel > > > > With best regards, Victor > > -- > Victor Wagner <vi...@wagner.pp.ru> > > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
