* Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote: > On 3/8/17 08:30, Stephen Frost wrote: > > Right, I don't think having an extra column which is going to be NULL a > > large amount of the time is good. > > Note that \di already has a column "Table" that is null for something > that is not an index. So I don't think this argument is very strong.
That's an interesting point. I think what I find most odd about all of this is that \dti and \dit work at all, and give a different set of columns from \dt. We don't document that combining those works in \?, as far as I can see, and other combinations don't work, just this. In any case, I won't push very hard on this, it's useful information to include and we should do so. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature