Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> If you don't want to make ExecInitExpr responsible, then the planner would >> have to do something like split_pathtarget_at_srf anyway to decompose the >> expressions, no matter which executor representation we use.
> Did we do anything about this? Are we going to? No, and I think we should. Is it on the v10 open items list? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers