Robert Haas <> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Tom Lane <> wrote:
>> If you don't want to make ExecInitExpr responsible, then the planner would
>> have to do something like split_pathtarget_at_srf anyway to decompose the
>> expressions, no matter which executor representation we use.

> Did we do anything about this?  Are we going to?

No, and I think we should.  Is it on the v10 open items list?

                        regards, tom lane

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to