Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If you don't want to make ExecInitExpr responsible, then the planner would
>> have to do something like split_pathtarget_at_srf anyway to decompose the
>> expressions, no matter which executor representation we use.
> Did we do anything about this? Are we going to?
No, and I think we should. Is it on the v10 open items list?
regards, tom lane
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: