* Peter Eisentraut (peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> On 2/24/17 16:32, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > set EXTENDED_DESCRIBE_SORT size_desc
> > \dt+
> > \l+
> > \di+
> >
> > Possible variants: schema_table, table_schema, size_desc, size_asc
>
> I can see this being useful, but I think it needs to be organized a
> little better.
>
> Sort key and sort direction should be separate settings.
>
> I'm not sure why we need to have separate settings to sort by schema
> name and table name. But if we do, then we should support that for all
> object types. I think maybe that's something we shouldn't get into
> right now.
>
> So I would have one setting for sort key = {name|size} and on for sort
> direction = {asc|desc}.Perhaps I'm trying to be overly cute here, but why not let the user simply provide a bit of SQL to be put at the end of the query? That is, something like: \pset EXTENDED_DESCRIBE_ORDER_LIMIT 'ORDER BY 5 DESC LIMIT 10' Thanks! Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
