Hi Andreas,

On 3/1/17 8:47 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2/3/17 07:12, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
>> On 01/25/2017 07:13 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> What I think you should do is making the code path of
>>> \\h smarter with some exceptions by using TailMatchesCS2() for ALTER.
>>> There is as well the case of DROP commands that should be treated by
>>> the way.
>> Yes, I think that is correct approach. I have attached a patch where I 
>> add completion for \h ALTER and \h DROP.
> Instead of creating another copy of list_ALTER, let's use the
> words_after_create list and write a version of
> create_command_generator/drop_command_generator.

Do you know when you will have a new patch available for review that
incorporates Peter's request?


Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to