Kevin Grittner wrote: > >> What is necessary to indicate an additional SQL feature covered? > > > > I assume you're talking about information_schema.sql_features > > I had forgotten we had that in a table. I was thinking more of the docs: > > https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/features.html > > I guess if we change one, we had better change the other. (Or are > they generated off a common source?)
See src/backend/catalog/sql_features.txt -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers