Hi, On 2017-03-13 15:45:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I could be wrong, but the most obvious explanation for this failure is > that autovacuum had a lock on the table or index when we looked. > Even if that isn't why axolotl failed in this particular case, I think > it's dead certain that we will see such failures from time to time > if this test script isn't tightened up. IIUC what the test is trying > to look for, I think adding "AND pid = pg_backend_pid()" to this query > would be an appropriate fix.
Yes, that sounds reasonable. Will do in a bit. Thanks for noticing. - Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
