hi Some errors are related to just CORRESPONDING without any columns. So using > expr doesn't help here. So parse node CORRESPONDING can solve both issues. > > In current implementation pointing to a node means pointing to a node’s first element so I don’t think we can be able to point to CORRESPONDING without any columns
I find out that there is already a node prepare for the case called A_Const. The attached patch use that node Regards Surafel
corresponding_clause_v5.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
