On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I agree with that, but I propose the attached version instead. It >>> seems cleaner to have the entire test for setting BM_PERMANENT in one >>> place rather than splitting it up as you did. >> >> Fine for me. You may want to update the comment of BM_PERMANENT in >> buf_internals.h as Artur has mentioned upthread. For example by just >> adding "and init forks". > > OK, done, and back-patched all the way.
Thanks. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers