On 03/16/2017 06:19 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 4:48 AM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> So I'm in favour of fixing the docs but I'm not keen on changing the >> SQL syntax in a way that just kind of papers over part of the >> problems. > > I agree. I think that trying to design new SQL syntax at this point > is unlikely to be a good idea - we're just about out of time here, and > some people who might care about this are busy on other things, and > the deadline for patches that do new things has long since passed. > But I like the idea of trying to improve the documentation.
Agreed. I think the documentation fixes definitely should be done, but understand that the grammar is a longer term issue with backward compatibility implications. Acknowledging the problem is the first step ;-) Joe -- Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
