On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Corey Huinker <corey.huin...@gmail.com> writes: > > I reworked the test such that all of the foreign tables inherit from the > > same parent table, and if you query that you do get async execution. But > It > > doesn't work when just stringing together those foreign tables with UNION > > ALLs. > > > I don't know how to proceed with this review if that was a goal of the > > patch. > > Whether it was a goal or not, I'd say there is something either broken > or incorrectly implemented if you don't see that. The planner (and > therefore also the executor) generally treats inheritance the same as > simple UNION ALL. If that's not the case here, I'd want to know why. > > regards, tom lane > Updated commitfest entry to "Returned With Feedback".
