Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> writes:
> createuser, dropuser - definitely pollutes the namespace, people do
> sometimes try them for the wrong thing. Unlike the db ones they do add
> value though -- I don't think we have a psql way of in a single command
> doing what --pwprompt on createuser does, do we? But given that we are in
> the process of breaking a lot of other scripts for 10, perhaps we should
> rename it to pg_createuser?
I'm not particularly on board with arguments like "we already broke a ton
of stuff so let's break some more". Eventually you've managed to create
a daunting barrier to upgrading at all.
I think a more reasonable way to proceed is to install symlinks
pg_createuser -> createuser (or the other direction), mark the older names
as deprecated, and announce that we'll remove the old names a few releases
from now. That gives people time to adjust.
Maybe we should handle createdb likewise, rather than just kicking it to
the curb. I know I use it quite often; it's less typing than psql -c
'create database ...' postgres, and still would be with a pg_ prefix.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
