On 22 March 2017 at 03:35, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 22 March 2017 at 09:49, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>> Overall, though, I think that 0001 looks far better than any previous
>>> iteration.  It's simple.  It looks safe.  It seems unlikely to break
>>> anything that works now.  Woo hoo!
>> Funny that this started with "hey, here's a simple, non-invasive
>> function for looking up the status of an arbitrary xid".
> Changes made per discussion.

This looks good to me also. Does what we need it to do.

I was a little worried by possible performance of new lock, but its
not intended to be run frequently, so its OK.

Simon Riggs                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to