On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:00 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:24 AM, Andrew Dunstan
> <andrew.duns...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> This is really a pretty small patch all things considered, and pretty
>> low-risk (although I haven;t been threough the code in fine detail yet).
>> In the end I'm persuaded by Andres' point that there's actually no
>> practical alternative way to make sure the data is actually synced to disk.
>> If nobody else wants to pick it up I will, unless there is a strong
>> objection.
> Thanks!

Thanks Andrew, I can see that this has been committed as 96a7128b.

I also saw that:
I'll send a patch in a bit for the regression tests.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to