On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas.mu...@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Per
>>> https://postgr.es/m/CAEepm=11ma_Z1HoPxPcSCANnh5ykHORa=hca1u1v1+5s_jw...@mail.gmail.com
>>> it seems that the dsm.c API is a bit inconvenient right now. I proposed
>>> in the first patch in that thread to change the API so that a segment is
>>> marked as "pinned" if created with no ResourceOwner set as current;
>>> which is essentially the same as creating a fake one, then marking the
>>> segment as pinned.
>>>
>>> Thomas agrees with me, so I propose this patch as preparatory work for
>>> the autovacuum/BRIN stuff I'm interested in.
>>
>> Here's the proposed patch.
>
> +1
- seg->resowner = CurrentResourceOwner;
- ResourceOwnerRememberDSM(CurrentResourceOwner, seg);
+ if (CurrentResourceOwner)
+ {
+ seg->resowner = CurrentResourceOwner;
+ ResourceOwnerRememberDSM(CurrentResourceOwner, seg);
+ }
You need to assign seg->resowner = CurrentResourceOwner
unconditionally here. Otherwise seg->resowner is uninitialised junk.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
