On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sure, I was telling you based on that.  If you are implicitly treating
> it as 2-dimensional array, it might be easier to compute the array

I think calculating spares offset will not become anyway much simpler
we still need to calculate split group and split phase separately. I
have added a patch to show how a 2-dimensional spares code looks like
and where all we need changes.

Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: expand_hashbucket_efficiently_06_spares_2dimesion.patch
Description: Binary data

Attachment: expand_hashbucket_efficiently_06_spares_1dimension.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to