Hi, we have a good number of '(GISTENTRY *) PG_GETARG_POINTER(n)' in our code - looks a bit better & shorter to have PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY(n).
Arugments against? Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
